<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taste in Poets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jgoodwin.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jgoodwin.net/?p=287</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:56:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jgoodwin.net/?p=287&#038;cpage=1#comment-3601</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jgoodwin.net/?p=287#comment-3601</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t, graduate school, because that kind of talk is regarded as quaint and altogether unsophisticated. I am coming to think that the true avant garde in literary analysis comes from precise aesthetic evaluation--a sabrmetric statistical analysis of which writers win ballgames and the critics who use them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t, graduate school, because that kind of talk is regarded as quaint and altogether unsophisticated. I am coming to think that the true avant garde in literary analysis comes from precise aesthetic evaluation&#8211;a sabrmetric statistical analysis of which writers win ballgames and the critics who use them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bérubé</title>
		<link>http://www.jgoodwin.net/?p=287&#038;cpage=1#comment-3599</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bérubé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jgoodwin.net/?p=287#comment-3599</guid>
		<description>Quite true, different maturity periods.  And as I tried to suggest in my comment 12 in that thread (via the Great Poets/ 1975 Masters analogy), it&#039;s best to take all this best-of talk with a light heart.  (Though I really do believe that Yeats&#039;s self-refashionishings are extraordinary in their intensity and variety.)  After all, we don&#039;t want to become the Christopher Ricks cited in comment 16, who declares that Yeats never wrote a true poem other than &quot;Sailing to Byzantium.&quot;  Given that caveat, though, graduate school would do well with a bit more talk about what kind of writing pleases well and why -- however informal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite true, different maturity periods.  And as I tried to suggest in my comment 12 in that thread (via the Great Poets/ 1975 Masters analogy), it&#8217;s best to take all this best-of talk with a light heart.  (Though I really do believe that Yeats&#8217;s self-refashionishings are extraordinary in their intensity and variety.)  After all, we don&#8217;t want to become the Christopher Ricks cited in comment 16, who declares that Yeats never wrote a true poem other than &#8220;Sailing to Byzantium.&#8221;  Given that caveat, though, graduate school would do well with a bit more talk about what kind of writing pleases well and why &#8212; however informal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jgoodwin.net/?p=287&#038;cpage=1#comment-3592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jgoodwin.net/?p=287#comment-3592</guid>
		<description>Different maturity periods.

I personally would have liked and would like to spend more time arguing about who&#039;s a greater, better, longer lasting, aesthetically superior writer in graduate school; but it just didn&#039;t seem to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different maturity periods.</p>
<p>I personally would have liked and would like to spend more time arguing about who&#8217;s a greater, better, longer lasting, aesthetically superior writer in graduate school; but it just didn&#8217;t seem to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bérubé</title>
		<link>http://www.jgoodwin.net/?p=287&#038;cpage=1#comment-3591</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bérubé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jgoodwin.net/?p=287#comment-3591</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s that &quot;Sailing to Byzantium&quot; makes the trousers-rolled line in &quot;Prufrock&quot; and the opening of &quot;Gerontion&quot; seem thin and watery.  And the &quot;something I haven&#039;t heard anyone take seriously&quot; bit is just too fashionable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s that &#8220;Sailing to Byzantium&#8221; makes the trousers-rolled line in &#8220;Prufrock&#8221; and the opening of &#8220;Gerontion&#8221; seem thin and watery.  And the &#8220;something I haven&#8217;t heard anyone take seriously&#8221; bit is just too fashionable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
